DX 3.9 Compatibility Issues with Self-Hosted Jama

Kemi
Kemi
  • Updated

Overview

This article addresses known compatibility issues with DX 3.9 and self-hosted Jama Connect (version 8.79.4) due to changes in the relationships API endpoint.

1. Summary of Compatibility Issue

✔ DX 3.9 does not work with self-hosted Jama 8.79.4 due to missing support for the updated relationships API endpoint.
✔ Jama does not include the 'labs' relationship endpoint, which allows retrieval of more than 50 relationship links per call.
✔ DX 3.8.4 works correctly with self-hosted Jama, but 3.9 introduces incompatibilities not documented in release notes.

2. Impact on Data Exchange

🚨 Symptoms of the Issue:
✔ Relationship imports or exports may fail with serialization errors.
✔ Users may see errors in logs indicating that the new endpoint is unavailable.
✔ Despite errors, DX should default to the original method, meaning relationships should still function.

🚨 Error Message Example:
"Failed Exchange: Error during EXPORT: SERIALIZATION phase. null"

3. Recommended Workarounds

Use DX 3.8.4 instead of 3.9 if working with self-hosted Jama 8.79.4.
If using DX 3.9, check logs—if the new endpoint is missing, DX should revert to the old method.
Request Support Bundle if encountering persistent issues.
Monitor release notes for potential future fixes in DX or Jama.

4. Best Practices for Self-Hosted Jama Users

✔ Verify compatibility between DX versions and self-hosted Jama versions before upgrading.
✔ If using a version of Jama without the ‘labs’ relationship endpoint, use DX 3.8.4.
✔ Report issues via support channels to track undocumented incompatibilities.

5. Conclusion

DX 3.9 has known compatibility issues with self-hosted Jama 8.79.4 due to API endpoint changes. *Upgrade to the most current version of Jama Connect
DX 3.8.4 remains stable and should be used instead.
Workarounds exist to minimize disruptions, but long-term fixes require vendor updates.

Was this article helpful?

0 out of 0 found this helpful

Have more questions? Submit a request

Comments

0 comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.